Nathalia Debski
Landlord and Tenant Board (LTB) Adjudicator Past Decisions
Overview
367
367
41
5
Order OutcomesPRO
Eviction Relief Granted to Tenant 41 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Nathalia Debski's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Nathalia Debski typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Lanlord's Notice Found Invalid 5 Orders since 2024PRO
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
TenantPlease subscribe v Please subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Please subscribe v Please subscribe v
Reason for Relief
Please subscribe to pro to view this content. Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Who Wins
LandlordPlease subscribe v
Please subscribe to pro to view this content.
Unlock Full Access to Nathalia Debski's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Nathalia Debski typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Contested Dispute by CategoryPRO
- Maintenance Issues24
Landlord Win Rate: 45.83%
- Tenant Agreed Termination18
Landlord Win Rate: 66.67%
- Property Damage16
Landlord Win Rate: 68.75%
- Tenant Rights13
Landlord Win Rate: 23.08%
- Breach Of Conditions8
Landlord Win Rate: 100%
- Illegal Entry8
Landlord Win Rate: 25%
Unlock Full Access to Nathalia Debski's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Nathalia Debski typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Orders
Webster v 1100 MS W Inc.
An LTB order dismisses a tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment concerning maintenance issues and an N5 notice.
Engel v Waterloo Regional Housing
The LTB dismissed the tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment because the allegations were not proven on a balance of probabilities.
The LTB ordered the Tenant to pay $24,486.00 in rent arrears and application fees to the Landlord.
The Landlord and Tenant reached a consent agreement at the LTB requiring the Landlord to pay $7,000.00 to settle a bad faith eviction claim.
CLV Group v Avril
The LTB dismissed the tenant's review request, confirming the previous termination order because no serious error was found.
CLV Group v Avril
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied the Tenant's request for a review of an order to terminate the tenancy, confirming the original order.
Webster v 1100 MS W Inc.
An LTB order dismisses a tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment concerning maintenance issues and an N5 notice.
Engel v Waterloo Regional Housing
The LTB dismissed the tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment because the allegations were not proven on a balance of probabilities.
The LTB ordered the Tenant to pay $24,486.00 in rent arrears and application fees to the Landlord.
The Landlord and Tenant reached a consent agreement at the LTB requiring the Landlord to pay $7,000.00 to settle a bad faith eviction claim.
CLV Group v Avril
The LTB dismissed the tenant's review request, confirming the previous termination order because no serious error was found.
CLV Group v Avril
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied the Tenant's request for a review of an order to terminate the tenancy, confirming the original order.
Webster v 1100 MS W Inc.
An LTB order dismisses a tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment concerning maintenance issues and an N5 notice.
Engel v Waterloo Regional Housing
The LTB dismissed the tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment because the allegations were not proven on a balance of probabilities.
The LTB ordered the Tenant to pay $24,486.00 in rent arrears and application fees to the Landlord.
The Landlord and Tenant reached a consent agreement at the LTB requiring the Landlord to pay $7,000.00 to settle a bad faith eviction claim.
CLV Group v Avril
The LTB dismissed the tenant's review request, confirming the previous termination order because no serious error was found.
CLV Group v Avril
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied the Tenant's request for a review of an order to terminate the tenancy, confirming the original order.
Webster v 1100 MS W Inc.
An LTB order dismisses a tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment concerning maintenance issues and an N5 notice.
Engel v Waterloo Regional Housing
The LTB dismissed the tenant's application alleging substantial interference and harassment because the allegations were not proven on a balance of probabilities.
The LTB ordered the Tenant to pay $24,486.00 in rent arrears and application fees to the Landlord.
The Landlord and Tenant reached a consent agreement at the LTB requiring the Landlord to pay $7,000.00 to settle a bad faith eviction claim.
CLV Group v Avril
The LTB dismissed the tenant's review request, confirming the previous termination order because no serious error was found.
CLV Group v Avril
The Landlord and Tenant Board denied the Tenant's request for a review of an order to terminate the tenancy, confirming the original order.
Unlock Full Access to Nathalia Debski's Decisions
Get a strategic advantage by understanding how they rule on similar cases.
Gain insights on how Nathalia Debski typically rules on cases like yours
Access a full decision history to boost your preparation and confidence
Quote past rulings to strengthen your argument
Latest Insights from Our Blog
Stay informed with expert analysis on rental law, tenant rights, and LTB decisions
The Maintenance Standoff: When Landlords Weaponize Repair Delays to Force Tenant Departures
Discover how some landlords deliberately delay essential repairs to make units uninhabitable, forcing tenants to move out. Learn the legal consequences and tenant remedies when maintenance becomes a weapon.
Illegal Lockouts and Self-Help Evictions: When Landlords Take the Law Into Their Own Hands
An analysis of illegal lockout cases reveals how landlords attempt to bypass legal eviction procedures through self-help measures, the severe financial penalties that follow, and tenant rights when facing illegal evictions.
The N7 Notice Filing Guide: Navigating Serious Safety Violations and Illegal Acts in Ontario
Master the N7 Notice to End Tenancy for Serious Impairment of Safety with this comprehensive guide covering legal requirements, evidence standards, and critical mistakes that lead to dismissed applications at the LTB.
Need Legal Help? We've Got You Covered
Whether you need to find qualified legal professionals or post your specific legal needs to get competitive quotes, our platform connects you with the right help.
Find Legal Professionals
Browse our directory of verified paralegals and lawyers specializing in Ontario rental law and LTB matters.
Browse ProfessionalsPost Your Legal Needs
Describe your legal situation and receive competitive quotes from qualified professionals in our marketplace.
Post a BountyJoin thousands of Ontarians who have found legal help through our platform